The Misconception of a Role Model and the Relation to an Athlete

A occasion manakin a noun, inwardness a person whose behaviour, example, or success is or sens be emulated by others, especially by younger people. An athlete excessively a noun, a person who is trained in exercises or contents involving physical agility, stamina, or strength a participant in a sport, exercise, or game requiring physical skill. Two entirely different words, and two very(prenominal) different definitions, yet one must wonder could it be that these scathe may in fact be very closely connect? Thus bringing us to the much debated issue of whether or non athletes put forward be appointed intention models.Over the years, this has proved to be an extremely opinionated issue for many. The truth is, an athlete is simply a person, and if we know people who argon our grapheme models, then yes, athletes, being people, can be positive portion models too. However in straight offs society there is a huge misc formerlyption surrounding the verge role model and th erefore there argon many blend opinions regarding this topic. Firstly, could it be that our expectations of athletes that ar perhaps too high, thus pr even soting us from comprehend the positive-ness in them.Secondly, in much(prenominal) a materialistic world, people a goodish deal blank out the passing between what they want and what they contract, and therefore if the world wants to look out prefect role models, with money, talent, and beauty, then they will look for that in people exchangeable athletes, because quite frankly, people are constantly in search of that good snappyitytime concept. Lastly, there is a reason why the word role comes before model. Our role models are only models in a legitimate role, or as one may say forte. Athletes are role models in our society, only only in the role of an athlete, and we often lug that.Consequently we may need to re think our definition of a role model before we determine whether or non athletes can be considered po sitive influences on our society. Today, when a high-status athlete is accused of a serious offence or of cheating the game, of pipeline it is news and newsworthy Take Michael Phelps for example no matter how many world records he breaks in the future, there will always be someone there to bring up the pact that he smoked marijuana at a party once. He wasnt even in emulation season, or training that day, ut he did it. He did something that many of us have done, yet because he is Michael Phelps, everything changes. We cannot consider ourselves perfect, because we fuddle mistakes all the time, so by chance we need to allow these athletes to try and fail at the non-athletic gay qualities, because in the end, they are simply human and, give care us, they often make mistakes too. We have these silent requests for athletes. We force them into becoming our role models we force them into achieving morality in the athletic world.Therefore, the mere fact that athletes are constantly ac complishing this excellence, although they are under great pressure, is evidence not of the failure of professional sports in society but of their triumph. We should be proud of Michael Phelps, because he is a positive role model, regardless of whether or not he smoked once upon a time, that merely shows us that this man has the talent and ability to entertain athletic success, and the events of a normal humane manner, at the same time.We should be proud because the days of baseball players drinking beer during the game or hoops players using drugs prior to the tip-off are long gone directly we find less of the athletes who carelessly fritter away their talent, and more of the athletes who are more admirable and, more superior role models than before. So maybe we are unsuccessful when it comes to recognizing this, and as a result we require even more from them. This could be hy our vision of a role model, when it comes to athletes, is impractical and unreasonable. Furthermore, i n such a materialized world as the present, we have forgotten what we need and replaced it with what we want. We used to have a good vision of the good invigoration where all we really needed was the basics, which can be found on Maslows Hierarchy of needs. Basics and necessities such as air, food, shelter, sex, safety, love and belonging, self esteem, and personal fulfilment.Now however, we have convey more technologically advanced, and the media has become such a huge influence in our lives which, inevitably, causes us to forget about the basics, and or else fill ourselves with greed, and want. We now feel that in install to have a good life, we must have money, fame, health, and beauty in appearance all of which we can find in athletes. So now, instead of having role models who are successful, and respect all of Maslows basic needs, we have role models who have all the things that we want.We look at these talented athletes, and we choose out the parts of them that we want t o have in our good life and we forget the parts of them that we need to have in our good life. We look at their outer(a) selves, and forget about their achievements, and their stories. Therefore, athletes can be positive role models for us, depending on what our image of a good life is. Now at last we look at what a role model is meant to do for us. A role model is not just a model they are a model of a ad hoc role which is a vital limitation.Like previously stated, none of us are perfect, thus, realistically speaking none of us are models for others. Parents, principles, club leaders we should all be modest and hope that the younger genesis do not follow in our footsteps entirely. For example, in the future, I would like my children to have my voice, passion for writing and sports, and my sense of love and belonging. However, I would not like them to have my health issues, or patience skills and tolerance when it comes to ignorance.You butt against, everyone wants to desex goo d examples, we all want to have a good life, fill up with our good qualities, not the bad, because then those who follow in our footsteps will be heading in the right direction straight from the beginning. So yes, of course athletes will often fail to model the role that we expect them to model, however we all make mistakes. We cannot expect them to model a role that they are not capable of leading, but nevertheless we can expect them to pageant good sportsmanship and commitment to fair play.In the end, we must come to construct that the question is not exactly Can athletes be positive role models? but instead, What kind of role model do you see athletes as? Our idea or a role model is distorted. We have such high expectations of them, causing us to treat them as if they were not human. We also need to take into consideration, our thoughts on a good life the difference between what we want to see in our role models, and what we need to see in our role models, because often we a re looking at the outer athlete, and not the true inner talent that they might have.Subsequently, we must dream up that athletes are models for their own specific roles, and like any role model they can be successful or they can fail at that role. Therefore we must simply judge them based on the vital constriction that comes with their role, and no more than that. We must expect from them only what they are capable of doing. The study and analysis of this issue has brought me to the realization that we have a huge misconception of what a role model is, and whether or not the proportion between role models and athletes can be made.